<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FairTaxer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fairtaxer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fairtaxer.com</link>
	<description>The FairTax - Understand it and you will Demand it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:16:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Graphic Comparison of the FairTax Versus the New Flat Income Tax by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/05/05/a-graphic-comparison-of-the-fairtax-versus-the-new-flat-income-tax/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1264#comment-1522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In regards to: &quot;The flat tax does not meet original Constitutional intent for taxation. #FairTax does, and it repeals the 16th Amendment&quot;.
This link explains it perfectly: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.originalintent.org/edu/docs/Constitutional%20Issues%20of%20Taxation.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Constitutional Issues of Taxation&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.originalintent.org/edu/docs/Constitutional%20Issues%20of%20Taxation.pdf&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to: &#8220;The flat tax does not meet original Constitutional intent for taxation. #FairTax does, and it repeals the 16th Amendment&#8221;.<br />
This link explains it perfectly: <a href="http://www.originalintent.org/edu/docs/Constitutional%20Issues%20of%20Taxation.pdf" title="Constitutional Issues of Taxation" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.originalintent.org/edu/docs/Constitutional%20Issues%20of%20Taxation.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HR-6169 &#8211; The Pathway to Job Creation through a Simpler, Fairer Tax Code Act by MerlinYoda (@MerlinYoda)</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/07/29/hr-6169-the-pathway-to-job-creation-through-a-simpler-fairer-tax-code-act/#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MerlinYoda (@MerlinYoda)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 04:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1345#comment-1521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FairTax certainly meets every one of the qualifications in spades :-). This Act has passed the House to date. Maybe we&#039;ll get lucky and it&#039;ll pass the Senate unscathed!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FairTax certainly meets every one of the qualifications in spades <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . This Act has passed the House to date. Maybe we&#8217;ll get lucky and it&#8217;ll pass the Senate unscathed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RE: Fair Tax: The Real Truth by MerlinYoda (@MerlinYoda)</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/06/25/re-fair-tax-the-real-truth/#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MerlinYoda (@MerlinYoda)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 00:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1299#comment-1519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little late to the rodeo, but I replied on this one (to one of Hank&#039;s later posts even) ... and this one seems to have stuck unlike the one I left on the latest blog post you&#039;d found (I think I must have thought it posted but messed up the CAPTCHA up or something).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little late to the rodeo, but I replied on this one (to one of Hank&#8217;s later posts even) &#8230; and this one seems to have stuck unlike the one I left on the latest blog post you&#8217;d found (I think I must have thought it posted but messed up the CAPTCHA up or something).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RE: 120711: Fair Tax by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/07/11/re-120711-fair-tax/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1320#comment-1518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just added another response. Hope he is starting to &quot;get it&quot;

Peter, if you don&#039;t mind, I would like to address comments from the 2nd two paragraphs of your original post.

&quot;Is it possible retail sales could drop significantly with the imposition of a consumption tax? My neighbors have decided to take responsibility for their own destiny. They have a large garden, chickens, a cow, as well as a portable sawmill. They produce as much of their own food as possible, they have a wood burning furnace [using wood collected from their own property] so they don’t buy taxable heating fuel; and with their own saw mill they produce their own lumber for their building needs. Working towards self sufficiency, their retail purchases along with the associated consumption tax paid would drop significantly. What happens if a “significant” portion of Middle America does the same? Will the federal government start punishing people for becoming self sufficient?&quot;

I&#039;m sure many people have this preconceived notion that &quot;oh, well, I&#039;ll just become self-sufficient and not pay the tax&quot;, but come on, we have to look at this realistically. Most people nowadays are WAY too busy to go chopping down trees to make firewood, or chasing chickens for dinner. That&#039;s why we have these new fancy things called -SERVICES- where we pay people to do that for us.

Sure, that&#039;s good for some people, but &quot;a “significant” portion of Middle America&quot;? Highly unlikely!

AFFT, has poured over $25,000,000 into researching the FairTax and its effects on America. I recommend taking the time to read some of that research. It is actually very informative. www.fairtax.org/research


&quot;Will I be committing a federal crime if I have my neighbor process some of my trees into lumber, allowing me to build a barn, if in exchange I help them install a fence around their pasture?&quot;

Absolutely NOT! In fact, isn&#039;t THAT what America is about? The FREEDOM to choose to do that if you wish. Under our current tax system, however, you probably ARE in violation of some tax code. Have you looked it up? Try finding that in the (now) 83,000+ pages of IRC tax code.

Want to read the FairTax Bill? Here it is, in its entirety, on a 34 Page PDF: http://fairtaxer.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/hr25-112th-congress.pdf


&quot;This is barter, and neither of us would pay a consumption tax on product or labor. In the USSR battering increased from around 5% to over 50% once a similar consumption tax was implemented.&quot; 

The &quot;similar consumption tax&quot; you speak of is the VAT. The Value Added Tax. The VAT is a tax on each level of production of every product produced. In essence, our current income tax code already has a VAT, because our current income tax code taxes the employers, employees, and products within each company within the US.


&quot;Why do the fair tax proponents discount the real possibility of retail sales dropping significantly with the imposition of a new consumption tax?&quot;

Because we strongly believe in the research that has been paid for by the Americans For Fair Taxation (AFFT). Over $25,000,000 and 16+ years has been put into the FairTax. Wouldn&#039;t you trust that over the word of some third-rate politician who stands to lose money because of the FairTax? I certainly do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just added another response. Hope he is starting to &#8220;get it&#8221;</p>
<p>Peter, if you don&#8217;t mind, I would like to address comments from the 2nd two paragraphs of your original post.</p>
<p>&#8220;Is it possible retail sales could drop significantly with the imposition of a consumption tax? My neighbors have decided to take responsibility for their own destiny. They have a large garden, chickens, a cow, as well as a portable sawmill. They produce as much of their own food as possible, they have a wood burning furnace [using wood collected from their own property] so they don’t buy taxable heating fuel; and with their own saw mill they produce their own lumber for their building needs. Working towards self sufficiency, their retail purchases along with the associated consumption tax paid would drop significantly. What happens if a “significant” portion of Middle America does the same? Will the federal government start punishing people for becoming self sufficient?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure many people have this preconceived notion that &#8220;oh, well, I&#8217;ll just become self-sufficient and not pay the tax&#8221;, but come on, we have to look at this realistically. Most people nowadays are WAY too busy to go chopping down trees to make firewood, or chasing chickens for dinner. That&#8217;s why we have these new fancy things called -SERVICES- where we pay people to do that for us.</p>
<p>Sure, that&#8217;s good for some people, but &#8220;a “significant” portion of Middle America&#8221;? Highly unlikely!</p>
<p>AFFT, has poured over $25,000,000 into researching the FairTax and its effects on America. I recommend taking the time to read some of that research. It is actually very informative. <a href="http://www.fairtax.org/research" rel="nofollow">http://www.fairtax.org/research</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Will I be committing a federal crime if I have my neighbor process some of my trees into lumber, allowing me to build a barn, if in exchange I help them install a fence around their pasture?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely NOT! In fact, isn&#8217;t THAT what America is about? The FREEDOM to choose to do that if you wish. Under our current tax system, however, you probably ARE in violation of some tax code. Have you looked it up? Try finding that in the (now) 83,000+ pages of IRC tax code.</p>
<p>Want to read the FairTax Bill? Here it is, in its entirety, on a 34 Page PDF: <a href="http://fairtaxer.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/hr25-112th-congress.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://fairtaxer.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/hr25-112th-congress.pdf</a></p>
<p>&#8220;This is barter, and neither of us would pay a consumption tax on product or labor. In the USSR battering increased from around 5% to over 50% once a similar consumption tax was implemented.&#8221; </p>
<p>The &#8220;similar consumption tax&#8221; you speak of is the VAT. The Value Added Tax. The VAT is a tax on each level of production of every product produced. In essence, our current income tax code already has a VAT, because our current income tax code taxes the employers, employees, and products within each company within the US.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why do the fair tax proponents discount the real possibility of retail sales dropping significantly with the imposition of a new consumption tax?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because we strongly believe in the research that has been paid for by the Americans For Fair Taxation (AFFT). Over $25,000,000 and 16+ years has been put into the FairTax. Wouldn&#8217;t you trust that over the word of some third-rate politician who stands to lose money because of the FairTax? I certainly do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HR-25 by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/hr-25/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?page_id=708#comment-1517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated ALL links to the Thomas.gov version of the Bill. Now you can view each section individually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated ALL links to the Thomas.gov version of the Bill. Now you can view each section individually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RE: 120711: Fair Tax by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/07/11/re-120711-fair-tax/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1320#comment-1516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Odd. I still don&#039;t see it up there. I hope he just hasn&#039;t gotten to it yet, and not just dismissed it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd. I still don&#8217;t see it up there. I hope he just hasn&#8217;t gotten to it yet, and not just dismissed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RE: 120711: Fair Tax by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/07/11/re-120711-fair-tax/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1320#comment-1515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You got that right, Bill! Well said!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got that right, Bill! Well said!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RE: 120711: Fair Tax by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/07/11/re-120711-fair-tax/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1320#comment-1514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is another response of mine to his reply to someone else:

Peter,

After your response to what John (NOT Joan) wrote, I&#039;m left wondering if you&#039;re interested in anything other than your own agenda.

I understand your position and commend you for standing your ground, but when this many people have clearly stated that you need to give the FairTax a chance. Wouldn&#039;t it behoove you to open up a little more and give the FairTax a serious look?

Here are my answers to your concerns, I hope they are acceptable:

1. Do you think there won’t be any federal tax collection agency?

Not like the IRS there won&#039;t be. As John mentioned, the &quot;tax collection agency&quot; will collect taxes ONLY from the 50 States. Section 401 of HR-25 Authorizes States to Collect the Tax. They remit those taxes to the United States Treasury and are reimbursed 0.25% of the tax remitted.

2. Who will send out the prebates?

That will be the Social Security Administration. This, I believe, is for a couple reasons. First, the FairTax ensures SS/MC are fully funded. Second, the SS# of every individual who qualifies for the Prebate will be verified. An unintended consequence of the FairTax is that SS Fraud will also be reduced.

3. Who will collect the money from the states or retailers?

As mentioned in #1, the United States Treasury will collect from the States. States will collect from Retailers (as they do now in 45/50 States).

4. Do you not think that the benefits will increase for the needy to cover the increased cost of living?

The FairTax helps &quot;the needy&quot; more than any other group. Here are just a few reasons how:
A.    The FairTax untaxes ALL spending up to $2,500/mo.  (depending on family size)
B.    The FairTax puts federal income taxes back in their paycheck.
C.    The FairTax puts SS/MC (FICA) taxes back in their paycheck.
D.    The FairTax removes embedded taxes from all goods and services.
E.    The FairTax untaxes ALL used goods, which the poor use more than anyone else.
F.    The FairTax ends the practice of taking more from the poor as they work harder and earn more.
G.    The FairTax will return many jobs the poor used to have, but which got shipped overseas.
H.    The FairTax increases the number of new jobs, which allows the poor to work their way out of poverty.
I.    The FairTax effectively ends the IRS, which have used their power to terrorize and intimidate the poor.
J    The FairTax dismantles a tax code that is so complex and convoluted the poor, and no one else, can understand it, and replaces it with a very simple tax system.
K.    The FairTax replaces a tax system that requires expert help, which the poor can’t afford, with one that doesn’t require any help to understand.


5. Do you not think bartering will increase?

It may. But if it does, is that not OUR choice? America is not run by politicians, it is run by the people, for the people. I understand your concerns, but let&#039;s not forget who you are campaigning for.

My question to you is this: Has bartering increased in the 45/50 states which collect sales taxes now? If it has, then it is insignificant. Otherwise, the Liberal Media would be all over it.

What is more likely is that, in the beginning, people will hold on to their money. (The FairTax does promote savings and investment). But then after people start to realize that what we have is permanent (not like the temporary Bush tax cuts), they will then start to spend more of their money because they have more to spend. If we are one thing, it is that we are a Nation of Spenders. Furthermore, donating to charities is also estimated to increase under the FairTax. The more money people have, the more they want to contribute to the needy.

6. Do you not think people will devise innovative ways to become self sufficient to beat the tax?

Let&#039;s hope so. This Nation was founded by innovative people who devised ways to build and create the America that we live in today.

That doesn&#039;t mean that people will stop spending money on frivolous products that make their lives easier. Would I grow a tomato to top my salad? Absolutely! Would I build a bicycle to get to work? Not likely.

7. Half the population does not pay taxes now. Do you think they will simply pay the consumption tax without complaint, or do you think they will try to figure out how to get around the tax?

Half the population not paying taxes now is due solely to our Income Tax system. That 1/2 which you speak of includes Illegal Immigrants, Tourists, and the Underground/Shadow economy. The FairTax is the only tax system that can (and will) effectively and efficiently collect taxes from them just as it does the hard working, legal citizens of the USA.

Once again, I URGE you to give the FairTax a more serious look. I do thank you for asking questions. That does say a lot about your character.

Thank you

Robert Williams
@TXFairTaxer (Twitter)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another response of mine to his reply to someone else:</p>
<p>Peter,</p>
<p>After your response to what John (NOT Joan) wrote, I&#8217;m left wondering if you&#8217;re interested in anything other than your own agenda.</p>
<p>I understand your position and commend you for standing your ground, but when this many people have clearly stated that you need to give the FairTax a chance. Wouldn&#8217;t it behoove you to open up a little more and give the FairTax a serious look?</p>
<p>Here are my answers to your concerns, I hope they are acceptable:</p>
<p>1. Do you think there won’t be any federal tax collection agency?</p>
<p>Not like the IRS there won&#8217;t be. As John mentioned, the &#8220;tax collection agency&#8221; will collect taxes ONLY from the 50 States. Section 401 of HR-25 Authorizes States to Collect the Tax. They remit those taxes to the United States Treasury and are reimbursed 0.25% of the tax remitted.</p>
<p>2. Who will send out the prebates?</p>
<p>That will be the Social Security Administration. This, I believe, is for a couple reasons. First, the FairTax ensures SS/MC are fully funded. Second, the SS# of every individual who qualifies for the Prebate will be verified. An unintended consequence of the FairTax is that SS Fraud will also be reduced.</p>
<p>3. Who will collect the money from the states or retailers?</p>
<p>As mentioned in #1, the United States Treasury will collect from the States. States will collect from Retailers (as they do now in 45/50 States).</p>
<p>4. Do you not think that the benefits will increase for the needy to cover the increased cost of living?</p>
<p>The FairTax helps &#8220;the needy&#8221; more than any other group. Here are just a few reasons how:<br />
A.    The FairTax untaxes ALL spending up to $2,500/mo.  (depending on family size)<br />
B.    The FairTax puts federal income taxes back in their paycheck.<br />
C.    The FairTax puts SS/MC (FICA) taxes back in their paycheck.<br />
D.    The FairTax removes embedded taxes from all goods and services.<br />
E.    The FairTax untaxes ALL used goods, which the poor use more than anyone else.<br />
F.    The FairTax ends the practice of taking more from the poor as they work harder and earn more.<br />
G.    The FairTax will return many jobs the poor used to have, but which got shipped overseas.<br />
H.    The FairTax increases the number of new jobs, which allows the poor to work their way out of poverty.<br />
I.    The FairTax effectively ends the IRS, which have used their power to terrorize and intimidate the poor.<br />
J    The FairTax dismantles a tax code that is so complex and convoluted the poor, and no one else, can understand it, and replaces it with a very simple tax system.<br />
K.    The FairTax replaces a tax system that requires expert help, which the poor can’t afford, with one that doesn’t require any help to understand.</p>
<p>5. Do you not think bartering will increase?</p>
<p>It may. But if it does, is that not OUR choice? America is not run by politicians, it is run by the people, for the people. I understand your concerns, but let&#8217;s not forget who you are campaigning for.</p>
<p>My question to you is this: Has bartering increased in the 45/50 states which collect sales taxes now? If it has, then it is insignificant. Otherwise, the Liberal Media would be all over it.</p>
<p>What is more likely is that, in the beginning, people will hold on to their money. (The FairTax does promote savings and investment). But then after people start to realize that what we have is permanent (not like the temporary Bush tax cuts), they will then start to spend more of their money because they have more to spend. If we are one thing, it is that we are a Nation of Spenders. Furthermore, donating to charities is also estimated to increase under the FairTax. The more money people have, the more they want to contribute to the needy.</p>
<p>6. Do you not think people will devise innovative ways to become self sufficient to beat the tax?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope so. This Nation was founded by innovative people who devised ways to build and create the America that we live in today.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean that people will stop spending money on frivolous products that make their lives easier. Would I grow a tomato to top my salad? Absolutely! Would I build a bicycle to get to work? Not likely.</p>
<p>7. Half the population does not pay taxes now. Do you think they will simply pay the consumption tax without complaint, or do you think they will try to figure out how to get around the tax?</p>
<p>Half the population not paying taxes now is due solely to our Income Tax system. That 1/2 which you speak of includes Illegal Immigrants, Tourists, and the Underground/Shadow economy. The FairTax is the only tax system that can (and will) effectively and efficiently collect taxes from them just as it does the hard working, legal citizens of the USA.</p>
<p>Once again, I URGE you to give the FairTax a more serious look. I do thank you for asking questions. That does say a lot about your character.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>Robert Williams<br />
@TXFairTaxer (Twitter)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RE: 120711: Fair Tax by MerlinYoda (@MerlinYoda)</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/07/11/re-120711-fair-tax/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MerlinYoda (@MerlinYoda)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 03:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1320#comment-1513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I left my $0.02 on there as well but I don&#039;t see it up there yet ... hopefully it shows soon :-).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left my $0.02 on there as well but I don&#8217;t see it up there yet &#8230; hopefully it shows soon <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RE: 120711: Fair Tax by Bill E. Payne</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/07/11/re-120711-fair-tax/#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill E. Payne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 23:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1320#comment-1512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;WHAT DO YOU THINK THE STATE OF THE NATION WOULD BE??&quot; Well, I think I could breathe easier, knowing that my efforts over the last decade finally helped produce something that benefits everyone. But, I digress. I think this country would be busy again, producing enviable products desired the world over. I think many illegals would give up and go home, leaving us to support ourselves instead of them. I think many of our impoverished citizens would have worked their way out of their fiscal rut, becoming productive members of a thriving society.

How&#039;s that for starters?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;WHAT DO YOU THINK THE STATE OF THE NATION WOULD BE??&#8221; Well, I think I could breathe easier, knowing that my efforts over the last decade finally helped produce something that benefits everyone. But, I digress. I think this country would be busy again, producing enviable products desired the world over. I think many illegals would give up and go home, leaving us to support ourselves instead of them. I think many of our impoverished citizens would have worked their way out of their fiscal rut, becoming productive members of a thriving society.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that for starters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FairTax Impact on November 2010 Elections by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/07/10/fairtax-impact-on-november-2010-elections-2/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1317#comment-1511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just glad others can use it. I got tired of hunting it down every time I wanted to reference it. Thanks Bill!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just glad others can use it. I got tired of hunting it down every time I wanted to reference it. Thanks Bill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FairTax Impact on November 2010 Elections by Bill E. Payne</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/07/10/fairtax-impact-on-november-2010-elections-2/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill E. Payne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 02:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1317#comment-1510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for putting that all in one place, Rob!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting that all in one place, Rob!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RE: Fair Tax: The Real Truth by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/06/25/re-fair-tax-the-real-truth/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1299#comment-1509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad you took the initiative to register and post your rebuttal. We don&#039;t need to be enemies or insult anyone. I&#039;m not here to belittle you, I just want you to understand where I believe your faults in the FairTax are.

&lt;blockquote&gt;So if rich pay less and the poor pay nothing, and you’re taking in the same amount of money, the middle class end up with the bag.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Again, you&#039;re ignoring the $19 Billion from Illegals, the $8 Billion from the Illegal Drug trade, the $7 Billion from prostitution/pornography, the $38 Billion from tourists, and the $345 Billion from the Underground/shadow economy. That is a total of $420 BILLION in Annual Tax Revenues that our Rich, Poor, and Middle-class will never have to pay out of pocket again. That means LOWER TAXES for ALL legal US citizens.

&lt;blockquote&gt;We both know illegals get fake ids and their bosses withold taxes to make sure they’re looking like they comply.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is OUR point exactly. Under the FairTax it won&#039;t matter because those illegals still have to purchase stuff to survive. THAT is where the FairTax hits them...not by &quot;bosses withholding income taxes&quot;. 

Something tells me you&#039;re not understanding the concept of having EVERYONE pay their fair share. Good Luck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you took the initiative to register and post your rebuttal. We don&#8217;t need to be enemies or insult anyone. I&#8217;m not here to belittle you, I just want you to understand where I believe your faults in the FairTax are.</p>
<blockquote><p>So if rich pay less and the poor pay nothing, and you’re taking in the same amount of money, the middle class end up with the bag.</p></blockquote>
<p>Again, you&#8217;re ignoring the $19 Billion from Illegals, the $8 Billion from the Illegal Drug trade, the $7 Billion from prostitution/pornography, the $38 Billion from tourists, and the $345 Billion from the Underground/shadow economy. That is a total of $420 BILLION in Annual Tax Revenues that our Rich, Poor, and Middle-class will never have to pay out of pocket again. That means LOWER TAXES for ALL legal US citizens.</p>
<blockquote><p>We both know illegals get fake ids and their bosses withold taxes to make sure they’re looking like they comply.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is OUR point exactly. Under the FairTax it won&#8217;t matter because those illegals still have to purchase stuff to survive. THAT is where the FairTax hits them&#8230;not by &#8220;bosses withholding income taxes&#8221;. </p>
<p>Something tells me you&#8217;re not understanding the concept of having EVERYONE pay their fair share. Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RE: Fair Tax: The Real Truth by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/06/25/re-fair-tax-the-real-truth/#comment-1508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1299#comment-1508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is from Tom Stark (a friend on Facebook):
First of all, RedneckDem, those who make more tend to spend more meaning under the Fair Tax they will pay more toward the upkeep of government because it is a consumption tax not an income tax. How much you make has nothiing to do with how much you pay except that those making less than the government poverty limit are reimburse the amount that they would pay on the first XXX dollars up to that limit. And they get it even if they never spend that much. So they could make money on the deal. This bill also adds many millions of people to the tax paying rolls because the tax is collected at the point of purchase and even if someone pays cash they pay the tax. Criminals pay, foreign tourists pay, illegal aliens pay, largely expanding the base of taxpayers. The one detrimental aspect of illegal status in the country under the Fair Tax is that you cannot qualify for the pre-bate so you pay the tax on every dime you spend. That, in itself, might be a further deterrent to illegal entry into the country. There are few truly rich people who pay 34% so your argument is a big red herring and cannot be given credibility by any thinking person.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from Tom Stark (a friend on Facebook):<br />
First of all, RedneckDem, those who make more tend to spend more meaning under the Fair Tax they will pay more toward the upkeep of government because it is a consumption tax not an income tax. How much you make has nothiing to do with how much you pay except that those making less than the government poverty limit are reimburse the amount that they would pay on the first XXX dollars up to that limit. And they get it even if they never spend that much. So they could make money on the deal. This bill also adds many millions of people to the tax paying rolls because the tax is collected at the point of purchase and even if someone pays cash they pay the tax. Criminals pay, foreign tourists pay, illegal aliens pay, largely expanding the base of taxpayers. The one detrimental aspect of illegal status in the country under the Fair Tax is that you cannot qualify for the pre-bate so you pay the tax on every dime you spend. That, in itself, might be a further deterrent to illegal entry into the country. There are few truly rich people who pay 34% so your argument is a big red herring and cannot be given credibility by any thinking person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RE: Fair Tax: The Real Truth by Redneck Democrat (@RedneckDem)</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/06/25/re-fair-tax-the-real-truth/#comment-1507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redneck Democrat (@RedneckDem)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 22:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1299#comment-1507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Redneck Dem here to defend my post. Looks like the biggest error you found was that Neal Boortz didn&#039;t make the Fair Tax famous....  Wow, that&#039;s hard hitting . Of course I didn&#039;t say a bunch of Repo congressmen didn&#039;t support it, I just said Boortz made it famous.  And it will die with him. I said that in the first couple of paragraphs.

Next you say by taking money that rich people pay (34% of their income currently) and lowering it to 23% (if they spend every dime they earn.  Then you say that poor won&#039;t pay taxes because of the prebate.  Finally you say the Fair Tax is revenue neutral.

So if rich pay less and the poor pay nothing, and you&#039;re taking in the same amount of money, the middle class end up with the bag. Don&#039;t fill me with that broader tax base crap.  We both know illegals get fake ids and their bosses withold taxes to make sure they&#039;re looking like they comply.

I&#039;m not trying to insult anybody, I briefly supported the Fair Tax. I know you&#039;re trying to better your country and make things easy for business to thrive and lift the tax burden off people.  I&#039;m just afraid to inform you that the Fair Tax will not do either of these.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redneck Dem here to defend my post. Looks like the biggest error you found was that Neal Boortz didn&#8217;t make the Fair Tax famous&#8230;.  Wow, that&#8217;s hard hitting . Of course I didn&#8217;t say a bunch of Repo congressmen didn&#8217;t support it, I just said Boortz made it famous.  And it will die with him. I said that in the first couple of paragraphs.</p>
<p>Next you say by taking money that rich people pay (34% of their income currently) and lowering it to 23% (if they spend every dime they earn.  Then you say that poor won&#8217;t pay taxes because of the prebate.  Finally you say the Fair Tax is revenue neutral.</p>
<p>So if rich pay less and the poor pay nothing, and you&#8217;re taking in the same amount of money, the middle class end up with the bag. Don&#8217;t fill me with that broader tax base crap.  We both know illegals get fake ids and their bosses withold taxes to make sure they&#8217;re looking like they comply.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to insult anybody, I briefly supported the Fair Tax. I know you&#8217;re trying to better your country and make things easy for business to thrive and lift the tax burden off people.  I&#8217;m just afraid to inform you that the Fair Tax will not do either of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Was Mitt Romney right about the FairTax? by Thomas Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/06/10/was-mitt-romney-right-about-the-fairtax/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1281#comment-1290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A figure that I never see included in any analysis is the reduction in product/service costs resulting from the elimination of lobbying expense paid to K Street Gnomes. The FairTax mitigates the impact that this group has on Washington, as tax credits for business are unnecessary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A figure that I never see included in any analysis is the reduction in product/service costs resulting from the elimination of lobbying expense paid to K Street Gnomes. The FairTax mitigates the impact that this group has on Washington, as tax credits for business are unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Was Mitt Romney right about the FairTax? by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/06/10/was-mitt-romney-right-about-the-fairtax/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1281#comment-1196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said Michael. I agree with your summation that we need more concise replies to the critics. I wish it were always that simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Michael. I agree with your summation that we need more concise replies to the critics. I wish it were always that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Was Mitt Romney right about the FairTax? by Michael F. DeBol</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/06/10/was-mitt-romney-right-about-the-fairtax/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael F. DeBol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1281#comment-1191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reply for Govenor Romney&#039;s comments is very detalied, with references,examples, etc. very well done. That said, it is also one of the problems attracting individuals to the Fairtax-and having the concept understood-the explanations can be lengthy, and so detaled, and complicated ,that it may cause people to drift away. A better answer might be:Govenor Romney, Govenor Romney, the Fairtax has very few (if any) negatives-it does accomplish two of your main goals-#1 allowing people to save their money the way they think best(by the way no tax on their savings) and completely eliminate taxes on income-#2-while completely un-taxing the lowest- incomes.The other goal you mentioned(too much government spending) will be in your capable hands when you become the country&#039;s new leader in January 2013-don&#039;t take our word, the complete research is available at Fairtax.org. Your background,education,inteligence,and experience-indicates you want to know all the facts-before reaching a conclusion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reply for Govenor Romney&#8217;s comments is very detalied, with references,examples, etc. very well done. That said, it is also one of the problems attracting individuals to the Fairtax-and having the concept understood-the explanations can be lengthy, and so detaled, and complicated ,that it may cause people to drift away. A better answer might be:Govenor Romney, Govenor Romney, the Fairtax has very few (if any) negatives-it does accomplish two of your main goals-#1 allowing people to save their money the way they think best(by the way no tax on their savings) and completely eliminate taxes on income-#2-while completely un-taxing the lowest- incomes.The other goal you mentioned(too much government spending) will be in your capable hands when you become the country&#8217;s new leader in January 2013-don&#8217;t take our word, the complete research is available at Fairtax.org. Your background,education,inteligence,and experience-indicates you want to know all the facts-before reaching a conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Was Mitt Romney right about the FairTax? by Your Questions About Income Distribution In United States - Income Distribution &#124; Income Distribution</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/06/10/was-mitt-romney-right-about-the-fairtax/#comment-1167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Your Questions About Income Distribution In United States - Income Distribution &#124; Income Distribution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 02:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1281#comment-1167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Lauryn Hill charged with failing to file three years of federal income taxes, report saysGovernment Spending as % of GDPEnd the harmful Illinois tax breaksWas Mitt Romney right about the FairTax [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lauryn Hill charged with failing to file three years of federal income taxes, report saysGovernment Spending as % of GDPEnd the harmful Illinois tax breaksWas Mitt Romney right about the FairTax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Graphic Comparison of the FairTax Versus the New Flat Income Tax by FairTaxer</title>
		<link>http://fairtaxer.com/2012/05/05/a-graphic-comparison-of-the-fairtax-versus-the-new-flat-income-tax/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FairTaxer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 01:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairtaxer.wordpress.com/?p=1264#comment-721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn, each of these are &quot;thumbnails&quot; to fit on the page. If you click on one of them it will open up the full size image.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, each of these are &#8220;thumbnails&#8221; to fit on the page. If you click on one of them it will open up the full size image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
